The titan that seems to get people all upset is the Warlord. And I can
understand why, we all know that the reactor blows up about twice as
easy as it should. The other problem, with all Imperial type titans,
is the shields. I think that the six shields are enough, but they
never regenerate fast enough.
I would rather have more flickering Gargant shields, then the Imperial
shields in use now, and that's sad, very sad.
I played a game not too long ago, where a Warlord was lucky enough to
actually make quite a few repair rolls, as well as shield regeneration
rolls. Even though I was the Ork player, I couldn't help rooting for
my opponent to make yet another repair roll, once again. I shot that
Warlord, over and over. Finally I killed it, after three Gargants
concentrated on it for a second turn. But it was great to see that
heroic Warlord take the punishment, and somehow come back to life,
battered, limping, but hanging on. I would like to see this become the
norm for Imperial type titans.
It's true that increasing the armor and shields would make the titan
harder to damage. This is not a bad idea. But nothing was better than
seeing that titan recover time after time. I would much rather see the
repair ability increased.
Warprat
"peter ramos" <pramos-_at_...> wrote:
original article:
http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic/?start=1703
> Hi!
>
> Oops! Forgot that idea, I really like it, it avoids making shields too
> strong while making them more effective.
>
> Peter
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Warprat <warprat_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2000 2:26 AM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Titan Revision
>
>
> > My vote is to increase the repair ability, from a 5+, to a 3+
perhaps
> > this is idea #2. This would increase the shield repair rate, and
make
> > it easier to repair the damaged parts of a titan that are
repairable,
> > like reactors. I think it would make titans "more heroic" in
nature!
> >
> > It's also a very easy fix that can also be applied to Eldar titans.
They
> > also have an easy blow reactor in front!
> >
> > Warprat
>
Received on Wed Jan 05 2000 - 03:47:09 UTC