Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] About army books revisions

From: NetEpic Webmaster <webmaster_at_...>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:31:42 +0100

Squats should be a good one, we have got several new units from Incoming! I
am particulary fond of the Hellworm, always wanted to build my own one ;).

Tom Webb
Webmaster of the EPICentre http://www.netepic.org - Home of Netepic, EPIC:
Armageddon, VOID and Heresy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Albert Farr� Benet" <cibernyam_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 10:26 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] About army books revisions


> Unfortunately, at this moment I cannot keep up with the revision in a day
by
> day evoultion, so I have to figure out which version (or perversion, uh,
> what a bad joke...) of the rules is discussed. As I was reading all this
> topic on the core rules & army books being too fastly updated without
> polling (as that is more or less what I understood) I have a proposal for
> Jar to soften a bit the problem:
>
> why don't just keep a SMALL log on each army book and core rules stating
> changes added, modified or supressed in each new version? not anything
> really big, just "added new flier rules, modified X unit, supressed
special
> rules for Y, etc...). A small .txt file would be more than enough, so
> everyone could follow up any changes without having to revise the whole
> file.
>
> Well, that was my 2 euro cents about it.
>
> BTW, when is (aprox) scheduled the start of the Squat revision? I have
made
> some codex armies, new rules & some new units (still polishing though) to
> add and some modifications.
>
> Albert
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu May 15 2003 - 09:31:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:54 UTC