RE: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] About army books revisions

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 08:22:54 -0400

Hi!

I am inclined to do the squats next after we finish the tyranids since
those two lists are relatively short and the issues seem to be just the
addition of more units.

Peter

-----Original Message-
From: Albert Farr� Benet [mailto:cibernyam_at_...]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 5:27 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] About army books revisions

Unfortunately, at this moment I cannot keep up with the revision in a
day by
day evoultion, so I have to figure out which version (or perversion, uh,
what a bad joke...) of the rules is discussed. As I was reading all this
topic on the core rules & army books being too fastly updated without
polling (as that is more or less what I understood) I have a proposal
for
Jar to soften a bit the problem:

why don't just keep a SMALL log on each army book and core rules stating
changes added, modified or supressed in each new version? not anything
really big, just "added new flier rules, modified X unit, supressed
special
rules for Y, etc...). A small .txt file would be more than enough, so
everyone could follow up any changes without having to revise the whole
file.

Well, that was my 2 euro cents about it.

BTW, when is (aprox) scheduled the start of the Squat revision? I have
made
some codex armies, new rules & some new units (still polishing though)
to
add and some modifications.

Albert


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu May 15 2003 - 12:22:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:54 UTC