Hi!
Excuse my belated response.
I don't mind these super heavies having holofields and the expense of
pop-ups.
Is this something we want on all elder super heavies or just on the
newer type and keep the older one with no fields and pop-up?
Whats better in peoples view, holo-fields or pop-ups?
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Zerloon [mailto:zerloon_at_...]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:03 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Eldar wrapup?
Hi to all!!!!
Comments belowe
At 17.59 10/08/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>A couple of things:
>
>- Eldar Super-Heavies should have Holofields (smaller than those of
>Titans: 3+ on Charge, 4+ on Advance and 5+ on First Fire) and lose
>the possibility to make pop-up attacks. Maybe armour should be
>lowered to 2+.
No pop-up but always skimmer right?
>- Eldar Flyers should have only 5+ all-around armour (actually they
>are the TOUGHEST flyers, very uncharacterful) and gain Holofields too
>(smaller than Super-Heavies: 4+ on Charge, 5+ on Advance and 6+ on
>First Fire).
I can live with this, but I shouldn't make a mess with too different
holofields.
We can give the SH the same holofield as Titan (they not charge, IMHO!)
Also per flyer they are much faster than titans, I thinks we can leave
the
armour save (sigh!!) but give them an holofield+manouvrability 4+ save.
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Aug 19 2003 - 22:10:25 UTC