Re: [NetEpic ML] Cost questions

From: Zerloon <zerloon_at_...>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 01:01:59 +0200

At 21.07 06/10/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>I apologize for the previous poll - I was about to put up a series of
>polls about unit costs, and realized I really should post something
>first to see if it's worthwhile. I've found a number of the Eldar
>units are over or under-priced. I was wondering if other folks have
>found the same.

For me can be worthwhile, but only if some people vote.

>Cobra: List cost 250, but the main gun always scatters and the
>secondaries aren't that impressive. I suggest dropping the cost to
>200, or increasing the secondary weapons (now 2 dice at range 25) to
>three dice and 50 cm. The To-Hit would remain at 5+, 0 TSM.

I'll say 200, but maybe as squadron like tempest (3 for 600)


>Wave Serpent: Perhaps the most massively useful APC in the game,
>IMHO. I propose raising the cost to 200 points.

I don't use them so much!! Well, for me should remain at 150, agree with Peter


>Vibro-Cannon: Currently the TSM is 0 if one hits you, -2 if two and -
>2 for three. I'd like to improve the seige capabilities by saying
>it's always -3 for buildings. Peter's suggestion (I think it was his)
>of making the titan Tremor Cannon be -6 TSM against buildings would
>also follow along with this.

Agree.



>Other Eldar questions:
>In 40k, is there a difference between a Scout, a Ranger and a
>Pathfinder? I'd like to name the basic scout one thing, and the
>Alaitoc scouts something else. Currently they're Pathfinders and
>Alaitoc Rangers. Is this generally acceptable?

Boh?


>Why did the Deathstalker name get changed to Fire Prism? Was that a
>GW thing?

Yes. I prefer Deathstlaker

Zerloon
Received on Mon Oct 06 2003 - 23:01:59 UTC