To be more specific, while it is not the intention that the Necrons should
be taken out of the slann army, both armies will undouptedly be able to
survive with the current rules as standalone armies....
Nils
-----Original Message-----
From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
Sent: 29. oktober 2003 11:40
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.
Actually the necrons in this review will work as a standalone army......
N
-----Original Message-----
From: AntiChrist [mailto:seimejote_at_...]
Sent: 29. oktober 2003 11:36
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.
I think we should go with the GW fluff... only Necron, and they are
EVIL. =)
--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Peter Ramos <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As we discussed the revised book there is one question I'd like
> commentary on.
>
> The current Slann/necron list was created and modified by input
from
> this list and it has fluff background unique and different from
GW's.
>
> Do people feel that a separate Necron and Slann army list in
keeping
> with GW fluff is necessary to add?
>
> Opinions?
>
> Peter
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 10:44:28 UTC