RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:40:20 +0100

Actually the necrons in this review will work as a standalone army......

N

-----Original Message-----
From: AntiChrist [mailto:seimejote_at_...]
Sent: 29. oktober 2003 11:36
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.


I think we should go with the GW fluff... only Necron, and they are
EVIL. =)

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Peter Ramos <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As we discussed the revised book there is one question I'd like
> commentary on.
>
> The current Slann/necron list was created and modified by input
from
> this list and it has fluff background unique and different from
GW's.
>
> Do people feel that a separate Necron and Slann army list in
keeping
> with GW fluff is necessary to add?
>
> Opinions?
>
> Peter



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 10:40:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:56 UTC