Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:50:35 -0400

nils.saugen_at_... wrote:

>No the necrons are older than our list! However, the bacground of the
>necrons have been unclear until the latest GW codex. They are infact a slave
>race (If you can call robots a race....) However, not to the Slann..... As I
>said I'm open to all suggestions, and the army has been thorougly testet as
>a standalone army and can hold it's own if neccesary!
>
>Nils
>
Hi!

I don't want to lose our own "fluff", we can make a necron list in
addition to the current one and let people play whatever fancies them,
but our list should stay, theres lot of work invested in it.

Peter
Received on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 21:50:35 UTC