Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:54:43 -0400

Jarreas Underwood wrote:

>I'm a little unclear about how the NetEpic Slaan/Necrons relate to the GW Necrons - is the background the same, did you come up with the Necrons before GW? 40k Necrons are some mongo bad guys all on their own, while here they're relegated to a support/slave race role. Which part do we want them to play? It's not really sufficient to say they're a stand-alone army, as that makes the assumption that they're subservient to the Slaan.
>
>Personally, my opinion is to leave 'em lower in the heirarchy - it makes sense that *someone* created a machine race. V'ger aside, machine races don't evolve.
>-Yar
>

Hi!

They "don't" relate Jar. The fluff is a total net epic created spin off,
where the slann create the necron to turn the tide in the war against
the tyranids.

So they are of a different nature than GW necrons.

Peter
Received on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 21:54:43 UTC