No the necrons are older than our list! However, the bacground of the
necrons have been unclear until the latest GW codex. They are infact a slave
race (If you can call robots a race....) However, not to the Slann..... As I
said I'm open to all suggestions, and the army has been thorougly testet as
a standalone army and can hold it's own if neccesary!
Nils
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: 29. oktober 2003 14:53
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.
I'm a little unclear about how the NetEpic Slaan/Necrons relate to the GW
Necrons - is the background the same, did you come up with the Necrons
before GW? 40k Necrons are some mongo bad guys all on their own, while here
they're relegated to a support/slave race role. Which part do we want them
to play? It's not really sufficient to say they're a stand-alone army, as
that makes the assumption that they're subservient to the Slaan.
Personally, my opinion is to leave 'em lower in the heirarchy - it makes
sense that *someone* created a machine race. V'ger aside, machine races
don't evolve.
-Yar
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
\~
|~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
|~ ^
/~ |
You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 14:00:57 UTC