I see your point Peter, but I really dont think my suggestions for the mech is to go too far. They are too difficult to take out for an epic-style game, and packs far too much firepower.
I would rather reduce the Slann even more, but that would have gone against the general hightech feeling of the army and would be impossible to pass on this list. In fact, I think the changes I proposed is the MINIMUM of changes that should be done, but I dont like chasing windmills, so Im not proposing any more changes.
At least not at this time... :-)
Eivind
>
> Fra: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
> Dato: 2003/11/02 Sun AM 03:31:38 CET
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann Revision TRUE SLANN (LONG)
>
> Eivind Borgeteien wrote:
>
> >I do know how to do it, its just downright boring! :-)
> >
> >Eivind
> >
> >
> Hi!
>
> I have always enjoyed the banter of the "northern connection" over this
> list. I think your point of view was important in toning down the
> original list.
>
> But dont you think your going "too far" in the other route? I dont find
> them boring, but perhaps you guys know each other too well and tend to
> plan and counter each other in stereotypical fashion. I have seen and
> have been participant of this phenomenon between well established groups.
>
> I think its hard at this point to separate balance issues from players
> issues. From my perspective as a player of the slann, they seem fine for me.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 03 2003 - 09:51:59 UTC