Mmmh... I don't agree either with you...
Maybe it's because my conception of breaking a unit and wiping it out is
based on two separate things and not a one as a consequence of the other.
My POV is that
- you get VP for breaking units as normal. This is the general rule that
applies to all armies.
- Besides that (and nothing to do with breaking units)<--stress on this this
in my opinion, a Nid army get extra VP for wiping out a unit BUT no VP for
objectives.
In my opinion, breaking a unit may cost more or less effort depending on the
unit and the army. But wipping out two units of the same point cost from
different armies *should* be equally easy or difficult.
Actually, it's not Squats who are the most difficult to wipe out at all.
Their units are quite few in numbers. But think about wiping out *gasp* a
complete ork clan... THAT is difficult.
Albert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angel" <angel_stranded_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Tyranids vs Squats
> Actually I think he's got a valid point. If Squats are harder to
> break then you should score more VP for breaking them, fair enough.
> But it's a lot easier to wipe out the few survivors once they've
> broken, and you shouldn't get the same VP all over again just for
> doing that.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 27 2003 - 13:26:41 UTC