Re: [NetEpic ML] Some thing about V5

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:22:20 -0400

Hi!

As a side note. The last version (4.1) will remain on the epicentre even
when 5.0 is added for those who wish to use that particular version.

Peter

nils.saugen_at_... wrote:

>Hi!
>
>Archi Magister F�ag�l wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi !
>>
>> I start to make some remarks.
>>
>>
>> ELDARS :
>>
>>
>>> I think Striking Scorpions and Howling
>>>
>>>
>> Banshee are too mighty in close combat. +6 is
>> too much. +3 would be more rigth. With a
>> laspistol (25 cm, 5+).
>> Theses Eldar Aspects are not better
>> than imperial assault SM. Theirs special
>> rules are more than enough.
>>
>>
>>
>True, this is an old "inconsistency". Problem is to change it might
>cause unforseen balance problems in the eldar army. I would test the
>theory and then perhaps submit the results to the group.
>
>The Eldar army is a frail little thing... Except for the Wind Rider Host, and Guardian companies you must rely on the quality of your specialist unis, and try not to sustain any losses. The Eldar has a steep lerning curve and is probably not a good army to start your career as a NetEpic general with. When you are there and have mastered the tactic of the army, you are going to be a formidabble foe for any army indeed! Back to the question at hand... If you reduce the quality of the aspect warriors, you'll need to increase the unit sice to compensate for the lack of quality! Then basically your back where you started... So I would suggest you leave it as it is!
>
>Nils
>
>PS: Is there anywhere else except the NetEpic Yahoo.goups archive where I can get a hold of the V5 armylists? I've only got Internet at work and the forum has been banned by our smartfilter... "One would think that since we are living in the democratic world, sensorship would be abolished... No, the workplace is still a dictatorship time to revolt!"
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jun 07 2004 - 19:22:20 UTC