Re: [NetEpic ML] Squats (a few notes on hellworm)

From: cibernyam <cibernyam_at_...>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:20:22 +0200

Hi,

For the small part I read while I downloaded the rest of books, I'm strongly
against mixing Hellworm with Land Train. They are two different units and
should have two different entries. I have to note also that rules on
open/close hellworm battlecars have been lost and remixed somewhere in the
vortex and induce a bit of confusion IMHO.

I have also to discorauge this practice of joining units to save paper.
First of all, because of clarity, second to avoid confusion and third to not
repeat what happened with exarchs. Have you noticed that nowhere says which
battlecars belong to which unit? If you buy a secialist battlecar for a hell
worm you can get a skyhammer? it is not te role of a hellworm to act as AA
platform. And viceversa, land train with buoy? any use in battle?

If you think it would be a better idea to classify them together, I would
recomend adding an entry stating common rules to 'convoy' units and then
place both entries with their battlecars separated. Or we can leave 'convoy'
rules for v6 core rules and let IG/TG have also trains if someone has the
will to design them or run a scenario with some railroads...

Albert

----- Original Message -----
From: "yar_underwood" <jarreas_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:32 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Squats


>
>
> Four issues with the Squat book and I think it's done.
>
> 1) Would someone please write a better background than what's in there?
>
> 2) Is the special rule Defensive Aerial Fire accpetible?
>
> 3) Zutiks are soft & flabby? What's the opinion on this rule?
>
> 4) I combined the Hellworm and the Land Train into one set of rules, as
> well as a unified list of battlecars. Reactions?
> -Yar
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 13 2005 - 19:20:22 UTC