Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann proxies and modifying the army lists

From: cibernyam <cibernyam_at_...>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 01:25:50 +0100

Yeah, the codex approach is the way IMHO. If we reach NetEpic v6 with some playtesting on that, maybe part of it can then be melded with the standard army.

albert
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Bruce Scott
  To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 1:16 AM
  Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann proxies and modifying the army lists



  The True Slann are ok, they have no vehicles at all....just Knight class "Mechs".

  The Exodus Slann are a low tech offshoot and I kinda like the "buggy" based vehicles. We have a couple of good choices for proxy both in the DRM and old GZG range. What is probably odd is that most of their vehicles are wheeled (at least 5 based on the desciptions), but their MBT is indeterminant (could be wheeled I guess) , but oddly they have a single skimmer as their "main" transport.....I guess it could be a VToL?

  I think what could be useful is if the Necrons are dragged out into their own Codex list. The current list is more than capable already, and there is more GW cannon and fluff on the Necrons available, including vehicle design now. It would certainly be understandable if they were made a Codex force and their units revised in light of all the new information. Some neat new units to be added too :)

  Given the wealth of excellent proxies now available, the Dracons could stand a little expansion so they could make a playable stand-alone army too. I need a good excuse to buy some more Kraytonians :)

  ******************************************************************
Received on Thu Dec 21 2006 - 00:25:50 UTC