[NetEpic ML] Re: Necrons for NetEpic

From: Gary <gary_clark1946_at_...>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:32:21 -0000

Bob you said it much better than I can.
I think I am getting grumpy in my old age. ;)
Gary

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "Robert McCord" <rdmcii@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> 1. Yes to Slann necrons and stand alone (or necro tyr) necrons
>
> 2. No to Slandroids!
>
> Rational - Actually the same reason for both. Netepic is
inclusive, it
> supports old GW fluff and can (and should) reflect current fluff.
I
> understand and approve of those wanting 'modern' necrons, hope I
see
> them. but for those prefering an older style fluff army, their
necrons
> should not be 'demoted' Call them Slann necrons, necro slann or
similar
> if you must but don't deny the flavor and instant recognition to
the
> name!
>
> We should be able to find a way to give everybody their necrons
and
> diverge the fluff to give everybody their semi GW background. It
goes
> to the heart of the strength of NetEpic, why it is the best epic
system!
>
> Bob
>
Received on Wed Mar 07 2007 - 01:32:21 UTC