Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperial Guard Clarifcations

From: madollin <madollin_at_...>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:46:35 -0000

Peter,

Thanks for that. Having but recently finished painting my bike coy I
am relieved it is now worth fielding again...

And that my fliers need no section HQ- next time he flukes a hit
it'll just reduce the firepower not lead to a long discussion,
though next time he'll probably buy Thunderfires...

rgds

Michael

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Peter Ramos <netepic@...> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> madollin wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > First email and hope that these have not been answered before.
> >
> > I was searching the message lists for Imperial bike CAF and
found
> > the discusiona nd poll asking to reduce bike CAf to +2 in 2002.
As
> > the poll came out 70% or so in favour of keeping CAF at +3 I am
> > wondering why IG bikes are still 350 but listed at +2 in
Netepic 5 ?
> > Is that a typo ? Or have they been reduced and if so why are
they
> > still 350 ?
>
> Typos, thanks for pointing them out.
> >
> > On typos is the hellhound to hit 4+ (as per description) or 5+
as
> > per stats ?
>
> Typo, should be 5+.
>
> >
> > Also, based on a game played the other night, how do fliers work
> > with IG ? I had a squadron of Marauders (maiden flight for
them) and
> > had designated one as a command plane, assuming IG need to have
a
> > squadron HQ vehicle for everything. Which was a blow when a
Squat
> > sniper managed to pick it out, hit it on snap fire then shoot it
> > down. Think start of the book Flight of the intruder...
>
> Fliers units, dont need section HQ or any other HQ types.
> >
> > Anyway having lost it what to do with the remaining two planes-
now
> > without command ?
>
> See above.
> >
> > The rules weren't clear - do they go onto no orders and land
(insane
> > behaviour if so) ? Take a morale test and if fail bug out ?
Carry on
> > as if nothing happened (As Navy fliers they follow their own
> > coherency and command rules as they're as distinct as Marines
from
> > techguard etc) ?
> >
> > Hoping that you can help
>
> It does need clarification. I will arrange to change the fliers
entry to
> reflect this.
>
> Peter
>
Received on Sun May 20 2007 - 18:46:35 UTC