Re: [NetEpic ML] Revision Polling So far (2)

From: Peter Ramos <pramos10_at_...>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:52:04 -0500

Hi!

The adding of new units (fighting vehicles, fliers, etc) to the army
lists are an integral part of any revision. In fact there are lists on
taccoms to this effect which I will use as guidelines.

Peter

On 4/19/2015 1:38 PM, martinshadowwolf_at_... [netepic] wrote:
>
> Peter:
>
> I can not recall if I through my 1/2 cent in on this poll, but if the
> revision means updating the Fighting Vehicles available to the
> separate factions to keep up with what is available through GW & FW
> currently, then I would have to say that I am in favor of a revision.
>
> Many Thanks
> Martin 'The Turtle'
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pramos10_at_... [netepic] <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> To: netepic <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sat, Apr 18, 2015 4:06 pm
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Revision Polling So far
>
> Hi!
>
> As of today the vote across the three polling groups (facebook group,
> mailing list and taccoms forums) is:
>
> 45 to 11 in favor of revision.
>
> If the votes in favor of the revision reach 50 (clear favorite) or the
> 24th (this Friday) comes around the final tally and decision will be
> announced.
>
> If the revision is favored then announcements on the format will be
> posted following the posting of the results.
>
> Peter
>
>
Received on Sun Apr 19 2015 - 19:52:04 UTC