With 4+ regen it should not be too bad. I'll try to do a small playtest with
these values and see what happens.
I've never used Warhounds much in the past since they dropped like flies.
Ken
---------------------------
There's a war out there, old friend, a world war. And it's not about who's
got the most bullets, it's about who controls the information. What we see
and hear, how we work, what we think, it's all about the information!
Cosmo, 'Sneakers'
----- Original Message -----
From: stefano andreoni <ltremari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 12:34 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: R: Revision Issue: Titans
> Hi!
>
> > Warprat wrote:
> > > 3) Perhaps the Eldar do deserve to have a 3+ repair roll, even if the
> > > reactor location is changed. I don't have enough experience with the
> > > Eldar to have a good gut feeling on that. I bow to your greater
wisdom.
> >
> > If we should consider the background Eldar machines are superior to
> > others in material technology and repair speed.
>
> I think that we should give them a better chance to survive barrages, too
> often I have seen them crippled with easy.
>
> However we must remaind that if we grant all imperial/chaos titans a 3+
> shield repair this wil be applied not only to warlords (the real problem),
> but also to reavers and warhounds that IMHO could be too good, remember
that
> a warhound hull cost ONLY 125 pts and you want a 3+ shield reapair!
>
> Stefano
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Registering a domain name is quick and easy.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/1611/2/_/7255/_/950863342/
>
> -- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
> -- http://www.egroups.com/docvault/netepic/?m=1
>
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 18 2000 - 08:56:53 UTC