1) Yes, i think all Titan reactors should be at the back. Why put
something as vulnerable as a reactor in the front where everybody and
their grandmother can take a shot at it?
2 and 3) These go hand in hand really, but it seems fair to me.
Will this imply that Slann titans get 2+?
I agree on all the clarifications as well
Rune
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:pramos2_at_...]
Sent: 2000-02-18 23:26
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans
Hi!
My, my all the traffic today.
The general slant is towards something simple and one target number. So to
move things along please vote on the three points below, Yes or No.
1) Move the Warlord Reactor to the back, no front shot possible.
2) Increase repair rolls on Imperial Titans to 4+.
3) Increase repair rolls on Eldar Titans to 3+
Note dont worry about the costs, ALL hulls and weapons will be re-evaluated
and redone on this list to account for rules changes.
Clarifications:
1. Shields or any type are affected only by weapons with a save modifier of
-1 or more, this has not changed
2. Holofields, I strongly suggest to extend their protection to barrages
sinse otherwise they are not worth it. Let us use the modified AT modifiers
to hit as per orders: first fire orders, no modifier top hit, advance -2 to
hit and charge -4 to hit. Straight and easy. Points costs will change to
reflect this
3. there is no easy way tp get around the scattering off the template and
missing phenomenon, so just leave it alone, its far easier to let individual
groups handle it on their own.
4. Weapons like vortex and warp missile MUST be changed since they are too
powerful.
Please decide if the above threee points are "fair" generalizations for the
moment and individual titans types and their shortcomings will be addressed
when we do titans which will be the FIRST thing we do due top the obvious
demand.
Peter
_____
<
http://click.egroups.com/1/999/2/_/7255/_/950913041/>
eGroups.com Home:
http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
<
http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic>
www.egroups.com <
http://www.egroups.com> - Simplifying group communications
#########################
This message has been scanned for viruses with F-Secure Anti-Virus for
Microsoft Exchange and it has been found clean.
For more information about computer viruses, connect to
http://www.DataFellows.com/vir-info/.
#########################
Received on Sun Feb 20 2000 - 20:17:39 UTC