Nope....
As you point out yourself it says the warheads are the same. Does the titan
missile have a maximum range per round of 35 cm? No, its range is limited to
its LOS. Can you shoot down the titan missile with AA? No you cant. So these
missiles can not be the same!
Nils
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hellreich_at_... [SMTP:hellreich@...]
> Sent: 22. februar 2000 17:45
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans
>
> It dose to need line of sight, They are really the Titan type weapon
> mounted
> on a Tank instead. AND BY THE WAY READ THE VERY LAST SENTENCE OF
> DEATHSTRIKE
> "THESE WARHEADS FOLLOW THE SAME RULES AS THE TITAN MISSILES OF THE SAME
> NAME
> (SEE TITANS IN TECH-GUARD CHAPTER)" RIGHT FORM THE BOOK. So you been
> palying
> them wrong. And if not misstaken, if tanks lose line of sight the missile
> was, I think, suppose to hit the colses random unit/ model.
> Peter alittle help here.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nils Saugen" <nils.saugen_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_...>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 4:37 AM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Revision Issue: Titans
>
>
> > I think we need some clarifications...
> >
> > We have always regarded the Deathstrike missile as a cruise missile
> > much like modern day tomahawks.
> >
> > So I've always regarded it as a small flyer. We use our own rules for
> > flyers (They are placed on the tabletop as any other units and has some
> > manuverability restrictions. They must move between half and full
> > movement, making no more than to turns each round with at least 10 cm
> > between the turns and with a maximum turn of 90 degrees (no singel turn
> > above 45 degrees)) These are the rules by wich the deatstrikes move.
> >
> > So if I'm able to backstab a titan, using the above manuverability
> > rules with the limited movement og the deathstrikemissiles. I would
> > very well say that my opponent deserved a warpmissile in the back.
> > Furthermore it does not say in the rules for the deathstrike missile
> > that the launch vehicle has to have LOS to the target. It says so on
> > the description for the Titan, but then again that missile is of a
> > different nature (no movementrestrictions for instance) I regard these
> > missiles as different weapons but with the same warhead.
> >
> > Comments???
> >
> > Nils
> >
> > "peter ramos" <pramos-_at_...> wrote:
> > original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic/?start=2274
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > The deathstrike missiles may fire warp missiles. The missiles however
> > move in a straight line from turn to turn and may NOT seek the
> > vulnerable areas in a titan. They may be shot down by AA guns on first
> > fire orders at a -2 modifier.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > Isnt there a IG battery with Warp Missiles? Deathstrike or something?
> > My
> > > friend, Nils, who
> > > plays IG says that these missiles don't have to be fired directly,
> > but arch
> > > around and hit
> > > a titan in the back. They can be shot down by AA on FF orders at -2.
> > Is this
> > > correct?
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Learn more with SmartPlanet. It's a new way of learning online.
> > SmartPlanet offers hundreds of courses to take on your time,
> > in your space. Join for FREE today!
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/1704/2/_/7255/_/951212264/
> >
> > -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> > -- http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=netepic&m=1
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________
> NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** Got Questions? Get Answers. Got Answers? Get Paid. ***
> Sign up at Infomarco.com and you can win $30,000 cash or a trip to China.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/1251/2/_/7255/_/951237944/
>
> -- Talk to your group with your own voice!
> -- http://www.egroups.com/VoiceChatPage?listName=netepic&m=1
>
Received on Wed Feb 23 2000 - 07:16:54 UTC