[NetEpic ML] Re: Net Epic Revision: Titans

From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 20:56:07 -0600


They don't have a direct translation into netpeic rules, but in comparison it had a better to hit and a better possiblility to make criticals than some plasma weapons!

If you want ot see more download the rules from Ken's page.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Warprat
  To: netepic_at_egroups.com
  Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 7:34 PM
  Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Net Epic Revision: Titans

What were the "old stats"?

Warprat ;)

Peter Ramos wrote:
> Hi!
> Hehe, we'll it seems that a consensus will not be reached here either.
> Its all a problem of vision I guess, Kelvin and I remember what this
> weapon USED to be, it was one of the best weapons to get, now its
> pretty trival. ANY IG battery is better than this. ANY alternate
> barrage weapon is better than this. The problem is NO ONE uses it. If
> a modifer is a bad idea, multiple templates is pretty bad too.
> To leave this weapon without a modifier really doesn't give it much to
> compete against better weapons of this type, range? Not enough to
> compensate.
> I cant think of much of a compromise. Heck, I'd rather scap this
> weapon altogether an bring back its original form at least that way if
> you gave it a high cost no one would agrue since its really good. This
> thing was originally anti-titan! It had a good chance for criticals
> too. It acted more like a hunter killer barrage than what it is now.
> Just a shame to see this weapon not used, with such a glorious past!
> What to do?
> Peter


  eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic
  www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
Received on Tue Mar 07 2000 - 02:56:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:53 UTC