[NetEpic ML] Re: Unit Coherency company cards comp

From: Weasel Fierce <septimus__at_...>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:57:12 GMT

>When the transports are part of the same detachment as the troops, the
>troops can unload during the same movement segment as the vehichles.
>
>But what about a situation like this: The Goff Clan buys Skullhammas
>for it's Boys and Nobs. Are the Superheavies independent detachments,
>since they have thier own Nobs on board, whould Battlewagons be
>independant?
>
>We have ruled that because the Skullhammas are a seperate transport
>detachment, that all the Boys (or Nobs) must unload in a seperate future
>movement, after all the Shullhammas have moved. Unloaded Boys could
>then unload from all the Skullhammas, and must maintain unit coherency.
>
>Is this correct?

seems so, also, it makes units that include transports in their detachments
(marines) more efficient because they can disembark immidiately without fear
of getting the APC's charged or shot. But they were propably trained to do
so anyway, so that seems only fair.
______________________________________________________
Received on Tue Mar 21 2000 - 14:57:12 UTC