Hi!
That particular vote will be reorganized and re-voted on.
Peter
> LOL tought we already voted, or was that one shut down.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 6:13 PM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Titan close combat-alot of rules!
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > The time is approaching for a vote and these are the main alternatives
> that
> > are in the pipeline:
> >
> > 1. Darius rule, which is a combination of standard close combat rules.
> > Defense system kills of infantry on 5+, 4+ for elites and then the
> survivors
> > go for the standard close combat romp.
> >
> > 2. Ed's modification of the current titan defense rules, where the save
> > modifier is dependant on the "class" of the unit.
> >
> > 3. Warprat's idea, where infantry roll 1d6 per stand plus combines CAF,
> > versus the titans 2d6 plus double his CAF. Compare the rolls, if the
> > infantry score is higher, one hit is achieved per multiple. Saves for
the
> > infantry are related directly to the amount of hits scored the more hits
> the
> > better chance of living. Zero hits means they are destroyed. Vehicles
are
> > too awkward and always die.
> >
> > Are there any other ideas or variants besides these?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > High rates giving you headaches? The 0% APR Introductory Rate from
> > Capital One. 9.9% Fixed thereafter!
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/3010/3/_/7255/_/956096108/
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
> _____________________________________________
> NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> High rates giving you headaches? The 0% APR Introductory Rate from
> Capital One. 9.9% Fixed thereafter!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3010/3/_/7255/_/956096544/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 18 2000 - 23:07:24 UTC