RE: [NetEpic ML] Slann, the required balance

From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:34:41 +0200

        I was mainly thinking of the true Slann. If anybody should have
higher
        BP's, it should be Slann and/or Necrons, not Dracons imho :-)

        Rune

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Peter Ramos [mailto:pramos2_at_...]
                Sent: 2000-04-27 16:15
                To: netepic_at_egroups.com
                Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann, the required balance

                Hi!


> Does this mean that the warp displacement shields for the
> titans are also reduced to 4+ or 5+?
>
> I can live with these changes, as long as the titan save
remains
> at 3+ fixed.

                Titans remain as is and the newer cost.

> One thing though. Since the Slann are hardy warriors, and
they
> are way expensive, shouldn't the Mechs and Vanguards (at
least
> the Vanguards, they are after all CU's) have a higher
breakpoint?
> If you increase the cost, and decrease the save on the
mechs, it
> will be much easier to get 12-14 VP's with the new prices.
> Only 5 Vanguards are needed to get 10 VP's (i assume with
the
> new prices). As far as i know, all command units break
individually,
> and i think the Vanguard should be the same, even if they
are
> a company card. Award 1 VP for each Vanguard killed?
>
> Just a thought...

                I have no problem in applying a higher break point to some
units. Are those
                mentioned above the only ones?


                Peter


        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                You set the price on thousands of products. Computers,
electronics,
                art, home appliances and more. Visit uBid today!
                http://click.egroups.com/1/3026/3/_/7255/_/956845018/
        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                
Received on Thu Apr 27 2000 - 14:34:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:59 UTC