RE: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0

From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:43:27 +0200

        Yeah, the price would have to go down accordingly. I suggest 1000
        for the Gravguards and 800 for the Spawnguards (only logical after
all :-) )

        Rune

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Peter Ramos [mailto:pramos2_at_...]
                Sent: 2000-05-22 15:37
                To: netepic_at_egroups.com
                Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0

                Hi!

                Thats a good point. Any other opinions on this? It's easily
changed. Also
                the price would go down and perhpas make them fielded more
often.

                Peter

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
                To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com' <netepic_at_egroups.com>
                Date: Monday, May 22, 2000 6:24 AM
                Subject: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0


>Hi!
>
>I was looking at the newest Slann rules, and something
struck me as odd.
>If the Slann are supposed to be so rare, and the Necrons so
numerous,
>why are the Slann 3 detachments per CC, and the Necrons
only 2? I agree
>that the Necrons should be 2 per CC, but shouldn't the
Slann be 2 also?
>
>Just a thought.
>
>Rune
>
>
        
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Now the best and coolest websites come right to you based
on your
>unique interests. eTour.com is surfing without searching.
>And, it's FREE!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/3013/5/_/7255/_/958994634/
        
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>


        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
                http://click.egroups.com/1/4054/5/_/7255/_/959002772/
        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                
Received on Mon May 22 2000 - 13:43:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:00 UTC