RE: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0

From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 17:00:22 +0200

        I disagree. If you can make a robot which fights as well as a human,
        why not mass produce them? Why even risk human lives if a robot
        can do the fighting? The armies of the world would looove to get
their
        hands on a fighting robot. The Slann would make enough Necrons so
        that fewer Slann would have to fight and lose their lives, after
all, isnt
        that the purpose of the Necrons?

        Rune

                -----Original Message-----
                From: hellreich_at_... [mailto:hellreich@...]
                Sent: 2000-05-22 16:58
                To: netepic_at_egroups.com
                Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0

                No this is wrong, True Slann would be more in number then
Necron, But would
                be few in number compared to Exodus, Necron and True Slann
would be few in
                number compared to Exodus. The True Slann would use Necron
intell for fast
                hard hitting tanks and other support weapons or infantry. No
need to mass
                produce something that can repair itself ( {like this} damn
human children
                hit the Necron company hard only half seemed to repair
itself, after this
                battle your greatness we will need to make another 100 to
replace them ).
                This showes that the Slann would only make as many as
needed, not a whole
                planets worth, there own little perfect race.
                ----- Original Message -----
                From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
                To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
                Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 9:37 AM
                Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0


> Hi!
>
> Thats a good point. Any other opinions on this? It's
easily changed. Also
> the price would go down and perhpas make them fielded more
often.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
> To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com' <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Date: Monday, May 22, 2000 6:24 AM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] A comment on Slann V.4.0
>
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >I was looking at the newest Slann rules, and something
struck me as odd.
> >If the Slann are supposed to be so rare, and the Necrons
so numerous,
> >why are the Slann 3 detachments per CC, and the Necrons
only 2? I agree
> >that the Necrons should be 2 per CC, but shouldn't the
Slann be 2 also?
> >
> >Just a thought.
> >
> >Rune
> >
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Now the best and coolest websites come right to you based
on your
> >unique interests. eTour.com is surfing without searching.
> >And, it's FREE!
> >http://click.egroups.com/1/3013/5/_/7255/_/958994634/
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/4054/5/_/7255/_/959002772/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

                _____________________________________________
                NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
                Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
                http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Missing old school friends? Find them here:
                http://click.egroups.com/1/4055/5/_/7255/_/959007366/
        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                
Received on Mon May 22 2000 - 15:00:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:00 UTC