RE: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial lists.

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 16:04:10 +0300

 

-----Original Message-----
From: EXT eivind borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
Sent: 24. May 2000 15:43
To: 'netepic_at_egroups.com'
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial lists.



I think the SoB looks like the SM, only weaker. I would not field them in
Epic without the support of some heavy firepower like IG SH, IG artillery or
titans.

This brings another question to mind, IG & SM has traditionally been
considered as one army, free to mix, TG has after some discussion not been
allowed to mix with the other imperial lists.

This is two polarized points of view I dont like. I think there should be
allowed to mix troops from the lists, but within some restrictions.

Maybe a core-force of one list, say 70 - 75% with additions from the other
lists by 25 - 30%?

Any comments on this?

Eivind

 [snip]
Yep, the Sisters unfortunately resemble the Marines very much. I tried to
give them a bit different character but that was only partially succesful.
As for mixing IG and TG I really don't consider them separate army; the TG
appeared and died with Titan Legions. In SM1 there was a rule of using
allies which gave the limit of using allied formations. I think we should
look it up and see if it can be applied to NetEpic as well.
 
Jyrki Saari
Received on Wed May 24 2000 - 13:04:10 UTC