RE: [NetEpic ML] Suggestions please.

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 19:31:55 +0200

I think I would limit that to griffons!!!! IMO bombards and basilisks should
be kept IG only!!! As for gorgons and Stormblades, that's good ideas, but I
think we should keep our emphasis on faster, lighter units!

Nils

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MrganKys_at_... [SMTP:MrganKys@...]
> Sent: 24. mai 2000 19:28
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Suggestions please.
>
> In a message dated 5/24/00 10:19:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> pramos2_at_... writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Not unreasonable at all. I like the suggestion of giving them the
> gorgons,
> > it seems to suit them and perhaps the stormhammer. I'd probably keep
> the
> > heavy artillery away from them though.
> >
> > Peter
>
> Of course. You're right on the artillery. Whirlwinds and SP thudd guns
> suit
> their mobile nature more then the IG's redition of the Russian "Red God of
>
> War". But maybe as a special card to simulate them being rarely used and
> few, but still in their arsenal for cracking particularly tough
> strongholds?
> Maybe the Bombards are too big, but if the list is seriously considering
> giving the SoB Leman Russ units then Griffons, which while Chimera
> variants
> are probably somewhat mechanically compatible with the Leman Russ chassis,
> as
> a seige artillery piece don't seem that much out of place.
>
> Christopher J Ruhl
> Staff Sergeant USAR
> Team Chief, 301st PSYOP Company (Airborne)(Tactical)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/4054/5/_/7255/_/959189284/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Received on Wed May 24 2000 - 17:31:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:00 UTC