RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] IG/TG/SoB and all things Imper ial

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 11:22:32 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EXT Joshua W Raup [mailto:deaconblue3_at_...]
> Sent: 25. May 2000 21:51
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] IG/TG/SoB and all things
> Imper ial
>
>
> Now my 2FIM:
>
> 1) The IG and TG. In this I support the combination of the
> lists. The TG
> is
> not that unique; it didn't even exist before the TL and
> hasn't been heard
> from since. In the original fluff there was no "machine god" (yechh! I
> relly
> hate that apparition), the titan legions were not part of Adeptus
> Mechanicus
> but formed their own branch of Imperial armed forces: The Collegia
> Titanica,
> of which the battle titans formed the part called Divisio
> Militaris. When
> titans needed infantry, IG regiments were seconded to them
> (the Scutarii
> regiments). The Knights were not really part of army, but a culture
> similar
> (somewhat) to Eldar Exodites. The knight worlds were seconded
> to a forge
> world: they supplied food for the FW and the FW supplied
> spare parts and
> machines for the KWs.
>
> -->This is how I remember things too. But I thought the Collegia
> Titanicus was a part of the AM. IIRC, from the Heresy fluff, teh
> Collegia was a part of the AM, and was split along with the
> rest of it,
> when the Heresy struck. That was why Mars was paralyzed when the
> Warmaster struck. Or is my brain finally curdled enough to mush
> everything together?
>
No it hasn't; I stand corrected. In the Adeptus Titanicus rulebook it says
clearly that titans are concentrated in one of the fighting arms of Adeptus
Mechanicus. Oh well...<shrinks slowly in the background>.

Jyrki Saari
Received on Fri May 26 2000 - 08:22:32 UTC