Re: [NetEpic ML] The Advance Issue

From: Warprat <warprat_at_...>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 23:09:19 -0700

Hi Darius!

You know Darius, for the last ten years I've been using Shokks with out
using the ability to stop a unit from firing.

Now, you might think that because of this, I would never use this unit
at all. I mean, I NEVER used them for the MAIN purpose of disrupting
the enemy's fire, never.

And niether did anyone else I played with. If I would have suggested
such a thing, they would have LAUGHED at me! Then told me to stop being
greedy, and get real.


Did this unit ever find it's way into my Group's armies? Almost always!

The ability to fire line of sight, and destroy any unit, make Shokks
awsome! And don't forget thier ability to empty buildings, etc...

All for only a hundred points. Quite a deal!


A STEAL, if you let them prevent units from firing, an absolute STEAL!

Warprat ;)





dardman wrote:
>
> Shokk attack guns are one of the coolest units the orks have. They have to
> be fired on FF. Their main purpose is to disrupt the enemy. If you can stop
> the enemy from firing you have achieved your goal with these units. I always
> take at least one squad and 2 squads in bigger games backed by a Runthedz.
> The last time I used them I double hit (auto destroy) twice in 3 turns, I
> killed 3 stands of my own boyz, 1 enemy stand and disrupted the enemy from
> firing many times. Pretty good for 100 pts. I opt to fire them at FF targets
> (usually infantry hvy units), then I go for armor and finally CC (I try to
> fire behind my troops if possible). I think this unit is fine the way it is.
> If you play them in the Adv phase or CC phase they won't be as effective.
> You are thinking of them as CC enhancer for assaulting troops, but they are
> more of a disruptor than anything. Take the enmey's ability to fire and you
> improve your chances to move on, gain objectives, take longer to break and
> win the game. You can try firing them in the CC or Adv phase but it won't
> make them any better.
> Darius
>
Received on Sun Jun 18 2000 - 06:09:19 UTC