>From: Warprat <warprat_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] silly question?
>Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 22:28:44 -0700
>
>Brother,
>
>Let us unite!
>
>
>Thanks for posting your obviously superior opinion. ;)
not at all
>
>Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
>Albert Farr� Benet wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, OK, but just imagine four terminator stands vs four gretchin stands
> > charging into CC.
> > Twenty cold-blooded elite veteran marines in terminator-one-inch-thick
> > armour forced to waste their twenty sustained fire bolters (not to say
> > assault cannons and cyclone launchers) because a pack of stupid greenies
>who
> > can't tie their shoes by themselves come shouting, ready to die with
>their
> > 4+ Morale ( or should I point 5+ ? I remember gretchins being stupid and
> > insanly coward not suicidal fanatics ).
> >
> > Under old rules, there was also a very common tactic with SM. You
>dropped
> > your troops behind enemy lines with gunshps, and if gunships survived
>next
> > turn, they could be used to pin vehicles by the rear side so they
>couldn't
> > fire at all: you loose 1 VP he wastes all his firing dice and becomes a
> > sitting duck ready to be fryed in Advance fire. Cheezie, huh?
> >
> > That's not fair at all. If rules are not Ok they should be changed.
> >
> > And yes, those were very extreme examples, but think about it.
> >
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Mon Jun 19 2000 - 09:57:53 UTC