I think you're right. This modifier should be aplied to any damage roll on
heavy armoured units, even if it doesn't refer to Titans or Praetorians. By
the way, don't you think it should be applied also to Squat Zeppelins? I
think those Zeppelin's are quite difficult to "ground" because of their
previous 4+ unmodified save roll. I also think that their previous save roll
shouldn't be used against Barrage weapons, because it refers to the hit
place.
>From: "dardman" <dardman_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>Subject: [NetEpic ML] What is the ruling?
>Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:13:41 -0400
>
>I have been thinking about this for awhile now. Do the weapons that add
>+1.+2 or even +3 to damage rolls for tians and praetorians also add these
>same bonuses to damage rolls for super heavies? Before net-epic super
>heavies did not have a damage table. Now they do and I feel it is proper
>that the same volcano cannon can tear apart a super heavy as easily as a
>titan. My example, my IG shadowsord hits an Eldar Cobra SH tank with its
>Volcano cannon, it fails its save and then rolls a 1 on the table, no
>effect. But the next turn I hit a Revernent titan and it fails it save, I
>roll a 2 and because most 5's or 6's are deadly, boom it crashes to the
>ground. My point is that If I hit one of these units I automatically damage
>it but if I hit a super heavy there is a chance of no effect. So I feel
>that the super heavies should be included as well. Let me know what you
>think.
>Darius
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Thu Jun 29 2000 - 14:37:36 UTC