Re: [NetEpic ML] What is the ruling?

From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:37:50 -0500

Hi!

I beleive that the original intent was to apply damamge modifiers to them as well, just like any other unit.

Peter
    -----Original Message-----
    From: dardman <dardman_at_...>
    To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
    Date: Thursday, June 29, 2000 7:15 AM
    Subject: [NetEpic ML] What is the ruling?
    
    
    I have been thinking about this for awhile now. Do the weapons that add +1.+2 or even +3 to damage rolls for tians and praetorians also add these same bonuses to damage rolls for super heavies? Before net-epic super heavies did not have a damage table. Now they do and I feel it is proper that the same volcano cannon can tear apart a super heavy as easily as a titan. My example, my IG shadowsord hits an Eldar Cobra SH tank with its Volcano cannon, it fails its save and then rolls a 1 on the table, no effect. But the next turn I hit a Revernent titan and it fails it save, I roll a 2 and because most 5's or 6's are deadly, boom it crashes to the ground. My point is that If I hit one of these units I automatically damage it but if I hit a super heavy there is a chance of no effect. So I feel that the super heavies should be included as well. Let me know what you think.
    Darius
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Thu Jun 29 2000 - 13:37:50 UTC