I'm a little reluctant to veteran HQs for the SM. The next step would then
be to "customize" the the ork nobz according to clans. We have tried this
and found it to be unballanced. Let a HQ be a HQ no matter what kind of
company it commands. (Exceptions would off course be assault and termie HQ
because of different armors and eq)
I'm not too found of veteran IG either, I think it diminishes the difference
between IG and SM. If veterans should be fielded I think it should be as
special cards with 1 or 2 detachments
Eivind
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Farr� Benet [mailto:cibernyam_at_...]
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 5:16 PM
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Veteran HQs
I haven't seen this rules. Would you mind re-posting them,please?
>From: nils.saugen_at_...
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Veteran HQs
>Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:05:54 +0200
>
>Hi,
>
>I agree, +5 for the SM veteran HQ should be more than enough.
>
>As for veteran IG, I think it would be best to limit those to support cards
>only. The casuality rate of the IG is so high that it's unlikely to have
>whole companies of veterans. A while back I posted some rule suggestions
>for
>different types of IG (Tallarn, Cadian, Mordian, etc.), perhaps we could
>use
>those(or something similar) as veteran IG support units?
>
>Nils
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Albert Farr� Benet [SMTP:cibernyam_at_...]
> > Sent: 11. august 2000 12:27
> > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Veteran HQs
> >
> > >Does it strike anyone else as kinda wierd that Space marine veteran
> > >companies have the same HQ units as everyone else? I'd think that a
> > >veteran unit would be pretty likely to have a veteran HQ.
> >
> > >My suggestion would be to have a Veteran HQ unit with the same stats
> > >as a regular HQ, but w/ one of the 2 special abbilities of the SM
> > >Commander (ie forced march or tactical genius) to be chosen before
> > >the beginning of the game. Thoughts? Would this make the SMs too
> > >powerful?
> >
> > Yip. I would use it the same way as Terminator HQ. +1 to Veteran CAF for
>a
> >
> > total of +5. No more.
> >
> > >And on a side note, why aren't there any special veteran units for
> > >the IG? In W40K (small-scale) there's an entire regiment (calan or
> > >something... called the "deathworld") that's considered veterans... I
> > >wouldn't think that the Imps would have that much difficulty fielding
> > >a company or 2 of veterans (and I'd also support the veteran HQ for
> > >them too)...
> >
> > For a company of veterans I would use tactical/assault/heavy stands with
> > an
> > extra +1 to CAF and morale rating 3+. If you find this too less you can
> > think of any way to improve them (What about no chain of command or some
> > advantages about it?)
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to
http://www.F-Secure.com/
Received on Tue Aug 15 2000 - 13:27:32 UTC