RE: [NetEpic ML] Planetary Defence Forces

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:49:34 +0300

You are right, the infantry companies cost too much. That is a mistake on my
part. The artillery and some vehicles have high VPs for a certain purpose,
namely that PDF doesn't exactly have plentiful resources so the loss of
equipment is far more serious blow than for IG. However, some still cost too
much so I'll adjust.
 
New VPs:
 
Infantry Companies:
Tactical: 4
Heavy: 3
Militia: 2 (A bit less than the point cost would indicate but there's always
more where these came from so the loss is shruggable)
Penal: 4
 
Vehicle Companies:
 
Sabre: 2 (These are cheap even for PDF to get)
 
Artillery Companies:
 
Light & Anti tank: 3
 
Support Cards:
Rocket Detachment: 1
Mammoth Detachment: 2
 
And there is a typo in the company cards table: Manmmoth company is listed
as having a Leman Russ command tank.
 
Thanks for pointing this out!
 

Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: EXT eivind borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
Sent: 24. August 2000 14:21
To: Netepic (E-mail)
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Planetary Defence Forces



I have read through the rules for PDF, and one thing strikes me: Isn't the
VP awarded for breaking the companies to high? I thougt it was 1 vp per 100
point as a general rule, but none of those seems to follow that. Do I
remeber wrongly......?

Eivind
###########################################

This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
<http://www.F-Secure.com/>

  _____

 <http://click.egroups.com/1/7752/6/_/7255/_/967115342/>
 
<http://adimg.egroups.com/img/7752/6/_/7255/_/967115342/greenaria_new3.gif>

  _____


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Fri Aug 25 2000 - 06:49:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:05 UTC