RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] Slann victorious again?

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:39:24 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EXT Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> Sent: 11. October 2000 2:59
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] Slann victorious again?
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I have come to the conclusion that the scarab cards may be
> overkill, perhaps
> just say they ARE part of Necron units keep stats as is and
> eliminate the
> scarab card. This way Necron assault are tough since they
> have scarabs doing
> all this to the enemy.
>
> As for warp jump, Eldar warp spiders have this why shouldn't
> Necron who are
> technologically superior? of course I'd add one thing, the
> danger of being
> lost into the warp like all slann units that have this, the
> good goes with
> the bad. how does that sound?
>

Logical and consistent with the existing stuff. I have been following the
debate about Slann for some time but Since I am not planning to build a
Slann army for a while I have been concentrating on other things like
Improved Warzone vehicle system. However, it seems to me that very little
playtesting has been done with the new version of Slann, so shouldn't we (or
those who are privileged enough to have opponents) sit down and play a
couple of games more before starting to modify things. Up to now there seem
to be the following things to observe:

-Necron warp jump distance.
-Disruptor missile effecs.
-Nullify field.

Anything else?


> Peter
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
Received on Wed Oct 11 2000 - 07:39:24 UTC