RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann probable change.

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:43:56 +0200

We have already remedied that!!! :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jyrki.saari_at_... [SMTP:jyrki.saari@...]
> Sent: 12. oktober 2000 12:35
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann probable change.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: EXT nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> > Sent: 12. October 2000 9:48
> > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Slann probable change.
> >
> >
> > Well, the reason for us wanting to change this is twofold.
> > First we will cut
> > time by rolling just once for each detachment, as you know
> > one of the main
> > reasons for us not playing as often as we like, is that Epic is rather
> > timeconsuming. This change would make the game more time
> > efficient, but it's
> > is just a bonus we get from the change. The main reason for
> > this is that if
> > you have to roll for each unit under the template, you're
> > almost certainly
> > going to miss on one of the units, making the rest of the
> > detachment stop.
> > This seems sort of unfair. So what we are saying is that we
> > have two options
> > in this case, either roll for the detachment, or let the units breake
> > cohernecy and leave their trapped comerads behind. Since we
> > don't like to
> > mess with the cohernecy rules, we'd rather roll for each
> > detachment. Now
> > we're going to have to test that over a couple of games, and
> > if we find that
> > it works alright, we'll propose that change to the rules. We
> > might want to
> > do some minor variations to the rules of course, in order to
> > compensate for
> > some of the obvious loss of power for the slann/necron player!
> >
> > Nils
> >
> [snip]
>
> It just occurred to me: How does this differ from the Wave Serpent wave?
> It
> is fired before movement, and probably hits just a few stands in a
> detachment. Those stands surviving the attack can do nothing for the rest
> of
> the turn. The rest of that detachment is stuck with maintaining coherency
> with those do-nothing stands yet nobody has said anything about those
> waves
> being unfair.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
> is
> money.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Thu Oct 12 2000 - 10:43:56 UTC