Eivind Borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...> wrote:
your 1 on 1 thing is what makes it hard to kill them, you lock out one of the tactics of the game like this by aplying a rule thats not there, makes it hard to over power a defender if you have to attack his whole line and not just a week spot....
The way we play, that you have to attack a whole detechment 1 on 1
before doubling up makes units with good caf even better.
Thats why we have a hard time killing necrons in CC, and thats why I
have suggested a reduction of 2 in their caf. If you could "single
out" units, a reduction of 1 would be sufficient.
We will try a reduction of 1 in caf tonight, but I expect my beloved
squats to take a serious beating.
It is very difficult to discuss CAF on new units if we have two
different ways of resolving CC. We have to agree upon one!
Eivind
--- In netepic_at_egroups.com, jyrki.saari_at_n... wrote:
> [snip]
> > I agree in principle, but it's still too vague about what happens
> > with multiple units, especially when weird situations crop up
(i.e.
> > one unit contacts two enemy ones, then an allied unit arrives but
can
> > only move to contact one of the two enemy units etc.).
> >
> > Either we lump everything together (but there's a potential
> > "cheesiness problem", like using a fast, large and cheap unit to
> > "span into contact" with several enemy ones and use the trick to
make
> > an elite CC unit join combat with all enemy units at once), or we
> > specify rules to solve the problem.
> >
>
> We might say that one detachment, no matter what the size, can only
charge
> one detachment. This leads to (at least) one problem, however, I
can see a
> whole clan of Orks being forced to charge an aspect warrior unit...
Although
> it is kind of Orky (Awright, ladz, now we give dose pansies a a good
> stomping, WAAAGHHHH!). Maybe an addition that if the charging
detachment
> outnumbers the charged by more than 2:1 then it can charge multiple
> detachments.
>
> Damn, this is surprisingly difficult.
>
> As for the pairing, I experimented with a method, but unfortunately
it
> requires some _bookkeeping_ to determine who is in CC with who, so
there's
> got to be a better way to do it. C'mon, people. Get those little
gray cells
> processing ;-)
>
>
> >
> > Luca Lettieri
> >
> >
> > -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor
> > -------------------------~-~>
> > Tellme Sports. Tellme Stocks. Tellme News. Just Tellme.
> > Call 1-800-555-TELL and hear everything. For info visit:
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/9529/6/_/7255/_/971877693/
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------_->
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
>
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and
time is
> money.
eGroups Sponsor
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
"Is it time to play?"
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
Received on Thu Oct 19 2000 - 20:47:32 UTC