Re: Battlereport Squat vs Necron Mantis & CAF

From: Eivind Borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 19:54:45 -0000

--- In netepic_at_egroups.com, "hellreich" <hellreich_at_n...> wrote:
I dont have an exact recollection of how the rolls went, I remember
I've rolled some bad rolls and some good. I even rolled a couple of
11s an 12s without that helping me much.

I dont know how you play, but we mostly place OPs in buildings, woods
and ruins. You cant go into such terrain with bikes. Then berserkers
is the only alternative unit to get those necron inf away from the
OPs

Where do you guys normally place OPs?

I really dont think the berserkers is all that bad with a +2 CAF and
rerolls 1s. It even better than tactical SM. But compared to necrons,
everything sucks...

Eivind


Well one thing that you need to tell me before we lower the CAF even
farther
> is how were your dice rolls for the Squats they sound like they
were below
> normal rolls? How were the rolls for the Necron player high?. For
Peter had
> no problem with the IG in killing them and Dairus had no problem
fighting
> them with Tyran army.Don't know about the one roll for Mantis the
Slann need
> this so rules will stay roll for each model since it really don't
harm
> troops and no VP are gained, plus they only can fire every other
turn. Well
> one thing to remember when playing Squats is lots of bikes and more
bikes,
> the Beserkers are a wast of points unless they are on a Train. With
bikes
> you pay 50 pts more but get a Higher CAF,20cm more move and 3 more
models,
> these are the CC guys the Squats need to fight against the Necron.
LOL :-)
> heck Beserkers aren't even a match for IG Tactical troops with a +0
CAF LOL
> :-).
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eivind Borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_i...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 8:44 AM
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Battlereport Squat vs Necron Mantis & CAF
>
>
> > HI!
> > We tried out the rules where we checked for each detachment under
the
> > mantis-template rather than each stand. As it turned out, the
> > difference was not that great, both my bikedetachments was
stopped.
> > At least they now had a fighting chance, so I think my group wil
> > stick to this rule.
> >
> > The CAF of the Necron Infantry should be reduced one further. My
> > berserkers ganged up 2 - 1 but didn't have a chance of capturing
the
> > OP. (I had one surving and one still locked up in CC)Next time I
play
> > up against the Slann/Necrons we will try this. Hopefully we can
> > schedule a refight soon...
> >
> > To fight a pure necron army is somehwat different than to fight a
> > mixed slann army, as the whole army regenerates on 4+. The squats
is
> > mainly a shooty army, so 50% of the casualities you inflict will
> > regenerate. To ensure some balance you have to have a fighting
chance
> > of inflicting some certian casualities. Its OK that your units
break
> > in the process, but then at least you have done some damage. As
the
> > Necrons don't check for morale, they always stick around to give
you
> > some further beating.
> >
> > Eivind
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In netepic_at_egroups.com, "Eivind Borgeteien"
> > <eivind.borgeteien_at_i...> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > I have just uploeded a battlereport to the vault. Hope you all
> > enjoy
> > > it. Thought it was to big to post the regular way.
> > >
> > > Thank god I have the day off tomorow!
> > >
> > > Goodnight!
> > >
> > > Eivind
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Why pay for something you could get for free?
> NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Received on Sun Oct 22 2000 - 19:54:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:10 UTC