Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: wraithguards

From: hellreich <hellreich_at_...>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:58:49 -0400

OK, 8>squeeze<8 LOL :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 1:21 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: wraithguards


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: EXT quester [mailto:quester666_at_...]
> > Sent: 24. October 2000 1:06
> > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: wraithguards
> >
> >
> > --- In netepic_at_egroups.com, "Weasel Fierce" <septimus__at_h...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >In my SM renegade supplement, eldar wraithguard stats
> > > >gives CC = +4 .
> > > >Why netepic rules gives +1 only ??
> > >
> > > I think a +4 is way too wild.
> > > In 40K the wraithboyz cant beat assault marines or veterans. They
> > are tough
> > > but not very dangerous in melee.
> >
> > >what? they have a 5 ws to a MS 4 and a MS standerd weapons will only
> > get through their aromr on a roll of 6 on a D6 and that will give
> > them a wound 1/3 of the time, bump them off their feet 1/3 of the time
> > or suck them into the worp 1/3 of the time with a 1 in 6 chance of
> > taking each mini in 2in. with them
> > and there not Dangerous in Melee
> > LOL
> > the +4 was to take this all in their hard to kill
> > and in RT way back when, they were 300 PT combat gods
> >
> [snip]
>
> Exsqueeze me? Wraithguard in RT???? I thought they were 2nd edition stuff.
> Were the rules in a WD and if so, could anybody scan the article for me?
>
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is
> money.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>


____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633
___________________________________________________________
Received on Tue Oct 24 2000 - 11:58:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:10 UTC