Re: [NetEpic ML] NetEpic WW2 (loong)

From: dardman <dardman_at_...>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 09:08:03 -0500

I really think making it too complicated scares people off. I would settle
for the +1 as the lowest or best save and stick with the rule of a unit that
does not have AT capabilities is unable to damage heavy and medium armored
tanks. Penetration is great but I am looking at speed and complexity.
Side/rear shots would be a -1 to save. Maybe a bazooka should have a -1
or -2 TSM and a heavy AT cannon should have a -3 or -4 or better depending
on the weaponry.
As for movement troops should move 10cm. 5cm is too slow. The idea of 2 CAFs
is good.
Also standardize the weapons because in 1939 to 1945 there were some major
innovations in weaponry in strength and ability. Leave options or dates or a
time line when these weapons began evolving.
Darius

_______________________________________________
Why pay for something you could get for free?
NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Received on Thu Nov 02 2000 - 14:08:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:10 UTC