Hi!
Actually i thought it be very illustrative and represents well the way it
should be done, where is the problem in your mind with this resolution?
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "warprat" <warprat_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Core Vote
> Hi Eivind,
>
> OHHH BOY, does your example look WRONG to me!
>
>
>
> In your example, I would do the following, after FF is done:
>
> 1) Pair the combats.
>
> A) sm7, ork4
> B) sm8, ork5
> C) sm9, ork6
> D) sm10, ork7
> E) sm11, ork8
> F) sm12, ork9
> G) sm5, ork3
>
> The Marine player, having troops doubled up, must make the following
> choices:
>
> H) sm1 or sm2, must attack ork1. The extra stand (say sm1), may double
> up on ork1, OR ork4.
> G) sm3 or sm4, must attack ork2. The extra stand (say sm4), may double
> up on ork2, OR ork7.
>
> 2) All pairs fight ONE round of Close Combat, if two units are fighting
> one enemy, the second stand gets to add 1d6.
>
> 3) The combat is resolved one pair at a time.
>
> 4) Any surviving stands still pinned by an enemy unit, at the end of the
> turn, will possibly fight a round of Close Combat in the next turn.
>
> 5) The surviving detachments (on both sides) may be given any order on
> the next turn, but any units still pinned in the next turns Close Combat
> Phase, must fight a round of Close Combat.
>
>
>
> What does everyone else, including Peter, think?
>
> Warprat ;)
>
>
>
>
>
> eivind borgeteien wrote:
> >
> > Here is tha powerpoint presantation. Hope it shows up!
> >
> > Eivind
> >
> > <<CC%20example[1].ppt>>
> > ###########################################
> >
> > This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft
> > Exchange.
> > For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
> >
> > Name: CC%20example[1].ppt
> > Part 1.2 Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint
> > Encoding: base64
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 02 2000 - 23:06:00 UTC