Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel

From: hellreich <hellreich_at_...>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 17:53:17 -0500

OO yes this is the way we do it so if a Volcano cannon were used for the second shot to thath location then it would be +1 for cumulative hit and +3 for the weapon damge, so when you roll for damage on the damage chat it would be 1D6+1 for cumulative hit+3 for the weapon= 1D6+1+3= which means this type of weapon used on a 2 hit would mean death.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Peter Ramos
  To: netepic_at_egroups.com
  Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 5:31 PM
  Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel


  Hi!

  I would not mind using Hellriech's interpretation for all titans regarding damaging and already damaged location. However remember that weapons would add their bonus OR the bonus for second and subsequent hits whichever is higher.

  I would like to hear other opinions on this point.

  Peter
    Hi!

    Sorry in the rule book v3.0, v4.0 and v4.1 it's stated as i said it. Look at this example:

    Quote Rulebook:
    Example: A Warlord Titan receives a penetrating hit to the reactor; the first roll for damage is a two, meaning the reactor is off line. A second penetrating hit again hits the reactor; the second roll is a 3. This second roll is added to the first 2 + 3 = 5, the total is the new damage level. This means that the reactor explodes destroying the Titan (the effect stated for a damage roll of 5).
     
     
    But i have to say that i like your way of interpretation. When it'S used this way, then a roll of a d3 is perfectly ok.
     
    Mhhhh..... What does our GrandMaster Peter say?
     
     
    Bye
    Dan Wolf

        eGroups Sponsor
       

  To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Sun Nov 12 2000 - 22:53:17 UTC