RE: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:59:05 +0200

 
-----Original Message-----
From: EXT Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 13. November 2000 1:43
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel


Hi!
 
I agree this looks like a better way of doing it, it also shows how titan
busting weapons are vital in killing titans. If any weapon is allowed to
destroy a titan on two damaging hits its no point to use the big guns, with
this methods every shot counts and thus these weapons are more important.
 
Depending on what people prefer we may make this the official ruling. We
still need to see all the opinions involved.
 
Peter
[snip]
 
I definetely support this method (eg. cumulative +1 to the damage rolls for
each roll after the first in addition to the weapon bonus). How about we
make another poll?
 
 

Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.

 
Received on Mon Nov 13 2000 - 07:59:05 UTC