--- In netepic_at_egroups.com, "peter ramos" <ramospeter_at_h...> wrote:
Hi
That will be netepic 4.1, right? Because in the rules I have(4.0),
the IG, TG and PDF are together...
Eivind
Hi!
>
> The books are just organized that way for convenience, it does not
mean
> armies in a same book can ally with each other. It was decided to
keep the
> sisters of battle and PDF in the same book because they were
created roughly
> around the same time and they haven't been tested as much as the
space
> marine, IG and tech guard which are in a separate book.
>
> Allies are strictly optional, each army regardless if it is in a
book with
> other armies is meant to stand alone.
>
> Peter
>
>
> >From: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_i...>
> >Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> >To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> >Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Sisters of Battle
> >Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:43:57 -0000
> >
> >Hi
> >I have wanted to try out the PDF for some time now, and finally
> >gotten the opportunity. I dont really like the new Defenders of the
> >Impperium booklet as I am strictly opposed to mixing armies. Theese
> >rules opens the oppurtunity to really cheese out your opponent.
> >
> >The only good thing about this new armylist is the PDF forces, and
as
> >they are quite underdogs, they can be mixed with any force without
> >being cheesy.
> >
> >Eivind
> >
> >--- In netepic_at_egroups.com, nils.saugen_at_s... wrote:
> >
> > > Well, It'll be the first test for us actually....... I think,
> >you'll find a
> > > battle report here later this evening or tomorrow... This might
be
> > > considered a prelude to our upcomming 10000 points battle
between
> >Chaos and
> > > a Slann/Dark Angels alliance. This battle is in it's early
> >planning, I guess
> > > we're going to play it somtime after x-mas.
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: jyrki.saari_at_n... [mailto:jyrki.saari_at_n...]
> > > Sent: 28. november 2000 10:10
> > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle
> > >
> > >
> > > Someone actually uses PDF??!!! Wow! Tell me how it went after
the
> >battle is
> > > over, I'd love to hear that (and I bet Weasel is interested
too).
> > >
> > >
> > > Jyrki Saari
> > >
> > > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time
and
> >time is
> > > money.
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: EXT nils.saugen_at_s... [mailto:nils.saugen_at_s...]
> > > Sent: 28. November 2000 10:11
> > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle
> > >
> > >
> > > Yupp I'have!!! They are really good!!!! Nearly beat a slann 3.0
army
> > > once!!!!! Playing them again tonight agains a knightsupported
> >planetary
> > > defence force!
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dardman [mailto:dardman_at_n...]
> > > Sent: 25. november 2000 16:39
> > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle
> > >
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried to play a Sisters of Battle army? I was
looking at
> >the rule
> > > last night and it seems like a cool alternative or at least a
good
> >SM/IG
> > > ally.
> > > Darius
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > eGroups Sponsor
> > >
> > >
>
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=150967.1016644.2717500.908943/D=egroupmail/S=1
7
> >000590
> > >
>
>80:N/A=468535/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N1198.egroups.com/B2610
5
> >;sz=46
> > > 8x60;ord=975399240?> click here
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
_______________
> Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com
Received on Tue Nov 28 2000 - 14:11:36 UTC