RE: [Net Epic ML] Re: Eldar Warlock Powers

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 18:29:27 -0500

Hi!

The rational behind flyers not being effected by such powers was simple. The
energy and area covered by the power is simple too small to affect such a
high flying, quick moving unit. Even a jet bike is easy to nail with these
spells in comparison.

I would like to see your flyer rules. I am thinking on making a flyer rules
book at some point to accommodate all these alternate rules and
interpretations.

Keep in mind we haven't updated the eldar book yet, but its good to point
this out since I will edit the core rule book as well as the eldar power
when the time comes.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave [mailto:warprat_at_...]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 9:40 PM
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Eldar Warlock Powers


Hi Peter, Quester, and all!


I'm going to put a set of Flyer House Rules together for my playing
group. It will be mostly based on the "Old GW Rules", with some
additions from Peters and Nils Flyer Rules.

I used some Warlocks on some T-Hawks last game. Looks like I made a
mistake, but you couldn't tell just by reading the rules. The rules
say ANY model, and Psychic powers are capable of being Snap Fired.

I sure would like to see that Games Workshop Q and A's, because I
viewed the Warlock Power as something that was more sustainable,
being as how it could last from turn to turn. The power can hold
Titans, so it's also strong. Many bikes are almost as fast as a
flyer, faster if you use a Chaos Card. But yet, bikes can be held,
and flyers can't.

Hmmmm, this still doesn't make sense to me. Warlocks and other
Psychers are usually a Special Card, so it doesn't seem a play
ballance issue.


Why this rule, anyone have any opinions?

Warprat ;)









To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Sat Dec 16 2000 - 23:29:27 UTC