Re: Question regarding armies

From: Eivind Borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:08:04 -0000

Hi
Just a note on the Norway-thing. I dont think WW2 Norway is good
suited for epic battles as there where mainly skirmishes here.

Many old norwegian tend to overrate the resistance in 1940, but
concidering the call to arms went out per SNAIL MAIL the very day we
got attacked, and the fact that the guns where stored in one place
and the end-pices in another made any attempt to mobilize quite
difficult.

I think Norway is more suited for conversions to 40K, but somewhat
later came the combined arm raid on M�l�y. This could perhaps be
interesting....

Hmm....

I will see what I can dig up.....


Eivind


--- In netepic_at_egroups.com, deaconblue3_at_j... wrote:
> wow I can t beleave you left out Normandy that would be the best
>
> -->I have a problem trying to recreate this in Epic. Not that it
would
> be a bad scenario or anything, just the whole naval invasion bit.
It's
> not really covered under the rules (even though I mentioned Inchon
as a
> possibility). If we could come up with a way to simulate that
aspect,
> there's be even more possibilities available. Salerno, Anzio,
Gallipoli
> (I mentioned that didn't I?), Norway 40, the Island Campaign in the
> Pacific, and so on. Another that I thought of would be the
Tannenburg
> Forrest (WW1), pitting IG vs Chaos. Lots of possibilities...
>
> Josh R
>
> Minister for General Mayhem
> "Don't let the bastards grind you down." Gen. Joseph Stilwell
Received on Wed Dec 20 2000 - 13:08:04 UTC