Re: [NetEpic ML] Return of the Slann first test: (long)

From: Hellreich <helreich_at_...>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:14:28 -0800

hehehe is that a mustache oopppsss here is a face cloth you have something
on your lip LOL :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karlsen Rune" <rune.karlsen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 5:50 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Return of the Slann first test: (long)


> Yes, i really did, but then i always enjoy playing with you,
> we tend to come to agreement easily and we're both willing
> to compromise for the sake of enjoyment of the game :)
>
> *Kiss a$$* ;)
>
> Rune
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> > Sent: 21. februar 2001 14:40
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Return of the Slann first test: (long)
> >
> >
> > We're all looking for the same, a good and playable Slann
> > armylist!!!! And
> > IMHO I think we have started down the right track! I really
> > enjoyed our last
> > game, and I guess Rune did aswell!
> >
> >
> > Nils
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: peter ramos [mailto:ramospeter_at_...]
> > Sent: 21. februar 2001 14:38
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Return of the Slann first test: (long)
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Again dont worry, I have no intention of doing this. The army
> > has been
> > tested a lot already. What we are doing is separating those
> > units people
> > have a problem with and standardizing stats. The only real
> > rule to test is
> > the newer warp jump rule. We are at a fine tuning stage, not
> > a development
> > stage. I dont forsee a great lag in getting this done,
> > especially since up
> > to this point there has been no resistance to the proposed
> > changes besides a
> >
> > tweak here and there. Consensus, it seems, has already been
> > reached, its a
> > matter of seeing first hand whether the changes made are good enough.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > >We arent really talking about the mech prices, they seem
> > >OK to me. I agree we need more testing, but none of
> > >us have the time to playtest Slann against all the
> > >armies, then vote for the rule changes, then playtest
> > >again. Also, see my previous post :)
> > >
> > >Rune
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> > ------------------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
> > eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
> > Click here for more details
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/kWP7PD/pYNCAA/4ihDAA/JfNVlB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------_->
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Received on Wed Feb 21 2001 - 17:14:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:16 UTC