A clarification: first line should read :"Maybe it would be BEST...". I just
hate typos.
Jyrki Saari
-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
> Sent: 06. March 2001 8:51
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Conflicting Rules
>
>
> Maybe it would be test to differentiate between morale and
> terror tests.
> Both are made the same way but are two different things, so
> confessor would
> make unit immune to MORALE tests but not TERROR tests.
> Currently the wording
> of chaos and tyranid critters states that a unit must take
> MORALE test when
> it is, in fact, a TERROR test.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes
> time and time is
> money.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > Sent: 05. March 2001 19:35
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Conflicting Rules
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > This is the correct interpretation. I agree that perhpas
> the wording
> > should be changed in the case when a unit uses ita morale
> > stat as a save
> > and not as a check. So units with a confessor would not
> make "morale
> > checks", but chaos powers would induce "a save with its
> morale as the
> > target number".
> >
> > Is this a better wording?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > quester wrote:
> >
> > > The power would over ride the rule becouse it is using you moral
> > > leavel as a save not as a brake test This applyes to all GW games
> > > sence they cabined willpower and leadership stats
> > >
> > > The power should be worded as take a willpower test by using the
> > > target brake test number
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > > nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This Topic is a real pain for me. There are rules that
> > come into
> > > conflict
> > > with each other, most often these revolve around moral testes.
> > >
> > > For instance if you include a Confessor in a
> > detachment, the rules
> > > state
> > > that that detachement he joins won't make a moral
> check for any
> > > reason. Then
> > > you have Chaos powers that state that every unit, even
> > those that
> > > normaly
> > > don't take moral tests, should make a moral test. There are
> > > several excaples
> > > of this "Conflict of Moral", which rule should take presidens?
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > RuneSmith Studio "we bring the art to war"
> > >
> > > 15 Summit Ave.
> > >
> > > Albany, NY. 12209
> > >
> > > http://odin.prohosting.com/quester6
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail Personal Address
> > > <http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=mailiyfoot> - Get
> email at
> > > your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > [AirForce.com]
> > >
> > <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=182283.1338155.2932296/D=egroupmail/S=1
> 700059081:N/A=597632/*http://www.airforce.com/cgi-bin/media/se
> tmedia.cgi?med
> ia=YH02Q201>
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Mar 06 2001 - 07:05:48 UTC